Why Matter with Kansas?
Hosted by Matthias


What's the Matter with Kansas is the title of a book by Thomas Frank (American journalist and essayist) published in the United States in 2004 and France in 2008. It analyzes the shift of Kansas (poor state of democratic traditions) in the Republican camp. Serge Halimi then extended the analysis to France several articles in Le Monde Diplomatique and in the preface to the French edition of the book.
The wording of this question is deliberately provocative. Frank writes with humor:
For decades, Americans attend a revolt which only benefits those it is supposed to reverse. The angry workers, with their numbers are rising irresistibly against the arrogance of the powerful. They waved their fists in the face of the son of privilege. They make fun of sensitive assignments dandies Democrats. They massed at the gates of beautiful areas and while the millionaires tremble in their mansions, they claim their terrible screaming: "Let us reduce your taxes! "
It is by no means a stigma of classes, on the contrary. The topic could have been worded more consensual (eg How can a poor man can it be right?) But it would have been a shame to deprive of a title that challenges us and asks us immediately. This is actually less poor than the political strategy of the right and the issue could very well be: How right she managed to attract popular support despite a policy inherently favorable to the rich ?
The answer to this question is fascinating in the case of the United States. To get their economic program reactionary, conservative Republicans have used the moral fiber, posing as defenders traditional values of America (nationalism, Puritanism, religion) to hide the real issues of economic and social policies. The example of Kansas is particularly illuminating:
Take the Kansas State Agricultural Midwest, both incarnation of the American heartland and at the same time radical politics land, once the bastion of anti-slavery movements and home workers like the IWW. And today? State ruined by multinationals, Kansas, especially in counties popular vote decisively for the most reactionary right. Thomas Frank shows how the Republicans ably have focused the debate on cultural issues - abortion, faith, lifestyle - rather than economic. Poor rednecks are mortgaging their homes to support politicians who harangue millionaires in language populacier, they extol the virtues of rural America, that "packs of beer and barbecues," condemn the Democrats who offend God by evolutionism and abortion, and despise the eternal American enjoying the sushi. But once elected, the Republicans apply an ultra-liberal agenda, "Vote against abortion and you will have the decommissioning welfare "says Frank.
It is obviously very interesting for us to expand this analysis to France: According
Halimi and Frank, the shelling endured by the working class world class war triggered by the last World hyperbourgeoisie thirty years have done to hide the proletariat, and much of the middle classes to a new opium of the people, that of a "moral universe" completely fabricated by the superstructure. The socio-economic issues have been left dormant because the leaders had " the ability to put forward their conservative field values. During his election campaign, Sarkozy has made us forget he was the representative and agent of the forces of exploitation and reassured by appealing to alleged core values, so-called old behaviors. The meeting Fouquet's billionaires have drowned in a victory that Champagne would have been impossible without the right to vote many unemployed Henin-Beaumont. To pass the gifts to his friends Bouygues and Bolloré, Sarkozy has managed to draw the proletariat and the small middle class now against the "haves" residents to the floor above (employees with statutes, unions and "special regimes"), sometimes against "assisted" relegated to a bit further, or cons to both. The traditional Left was unable to counter the speech Sarkozian, terrified at the thought of being accused of populism. Twenty years have also been privatized TF1 forget popular categories that there could be collective struggles for wages, for the democratic management of enterprises for a national education which is not in the service of big business.
It is therefore among the tracks explanation: the political tactics of the right, the economic and social sacrifices to the left and the middle class, the control of the school and the media by the ruling classes, the erasure of class consciousness in the minds among those suffering most from the system in place, etc..
This issue is obviously important as a tactical understanding of the mechanisms of the popular vote is the basic right of every fight (left?) Against the manipulations of the dominant discourse.
- Thomas Frank's book, Why the Matter with Kansas? How conservatives won the heart of the United States (and that of other rich countries) , Agon, 2008. You can read articles on the press review on the site Agone editions: http://atheles.org/agone/contrefeux/pourquoilespauvresvotentadroite/
- Two articles by Serge Halimi in Le Monde Diplomatique: at the time of presidential elections United States in 2004 (http://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/2004/10/HALIMI/11549) then when the presidential elections in France in 2007 (http://www.la-bas.org/article . php3? id_article = 1167 & var_recherche =% E9 + national identity)
- François Ruffin's book, The class war , Fayard, 2008. He must read the book (if found on the internet listing: http://media.la-bas.org/IMG/La_guerre_des_classes-prologue.pdf) and listen to the broadcast of Mermet about it: http: / / www.la-bas.org/article.php3?id_article=1519
Matthias
Paper presentation:
www.lesvertsguebwiller.com / caferepaireflorival / pauvredroite.pdf